Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1993No. 92-7646, 92-7733PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

These appeals, consolidated for purposes of oral argument, arise from the kidnapping and subsequent sexual abuse of Deanna Marie Caveny (Caveny). Defendants-appellants Duane Albert Anderson (Anderson) and Mark Charles Barnett, a/k/a Neil Thomas Hanley (Barnett), challenge the sentences imposed following the entry of their pleas of guilty to the federal kidnapping offense. Anderson contends that the district court erred in calculating his base offense level for kidnapping by allegedly counting the kidnapping offense twice, first by relying on the kidnapping guideline,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Leonard Orozco BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth Karl KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Sanders v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. CapersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. George Dean MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API