Legal Opinion

In Re Hildebrand

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 16, 2007No. 05-537PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

917 A.2d 478 (2007)

2007 VT 5

In re Appeal of HILDEBRAND.

No. 05-537.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 16, 2007.

Present: REIBER, C.J., JOHNSON, SKOGLUND, and BURGESS, JJ., and CRAWFORD, Superior Judge, Specially Assigned.

ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1. Joan Hildebrand, and her son James, appeal the Environmental Court's denial of their motion for summary judgment. The court ruled that the Waitsfield Planning Commission had appropriately denied the Hildebrands' application to amend the subdivision permit because they had not demonstrated a change in circumstances. We affirm.

¶ 2. A review of the history of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

City of South Burlington v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
In Re Nehemiah Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
Washington v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
In Re Appeal of Department of Buildings & General ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
In re Stowe Highlands Merger/Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
316 Main St. LLCVermont Superior Court · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.