Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward A. Wild, Jr. And Louis Corrado
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 2, 1970No. 76-79, Dockets 32510-32513PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge:
Edward A. Wild, Jr., and Louis Cornado appeal from their convictions by a jury in the Southern District of New York of violating the Comstock Act. 18 U.S.C. § 1461. They were found guilty of conspiracy to use the mails for conveyance and delivery of obscene color slides and photographs and of numerous mailings of obscene color slides and information regarding how to obtain them. Wild was sentenced to two years imprisonment; the execution of a similar sentence upon Corrado was suspended, and he was placed on probation for two years.
The appeals raise two questions: whether…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- United States v. Samuel F. ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. William L. ThomaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Luis Marti and Lou SaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.