Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Shaughnessy
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 2006No. D046465PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Michelle Shaughnessy (Michelle) appeals from a postjudgment order entered on April 14, 2005, modifying a 2003 judgment that required her former husband, C. Greg Shaughnessy (Greg), to pay her spousal support. Michelle and Greg were married for 15 years and had no children. At the time they separated in March 1995, Michelle was 35 years old. By 2005, Greg had been paying Michelle spousal support for nearly 10 years, supplementing her income as a self-employed florist. In the 2005 order modifying the judgment, the trial court ordered that the amount of spousal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Marriage of RosanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re Marriage of BrantnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Khera v. SameerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Swain v. Swain (In re Swain), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Geraci v. GeraciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Marriage of Dong and Garbe CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Marriage of Gonzalez CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.