Legal Opinion

Stenhouse v. Lynch, SEC. of Revenue

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 1978No. 7710SC646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

G.S. 105-267 is applicable to the tax collection of which plaintiffs complain, and provides (as written when this action was instituted) in pertinent part as follows:

“Whenever a person shall have a valid defense to the enforcement of the collection of a tax assessed or charged against him or his property, such person shall pay such tax to the proper officer, and such payment shall be without prejudice to any defense of rights he may have in the premises. At any time within 30 days after payment, the taxpayer may demand a refund of the tax paid in writing from the Secretary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gramling v. MaxwellDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1931
  2. Kirkpatrick v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Middleton v. Wilmington, Brunswick & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Swanson v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Swanson v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API