Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Wilmington, Brunswick & Southern Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

Tbe appellant contends tbat tbe court, notwithstanding tbe provisions of G. S., 105-403; C. S., 1976, should not bave allowed tbat portion of tbe respective claims for taxes filed by tbe county of Brunswick and tbe town of Southport which consisted of penalties and interest accrued on taxes assessed prior to receivership and which accumulated during tbe period when tbe property so assessed was in tbe custody of tbe court".

Upon tbe threshold of this appeal we are confronted with motions, interposed in this Court on behalf of tbe county of Brunswick and tbe town of Southport, to dismiss tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Town of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Blackwell v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Hunt v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue v. . Hans Rees' SonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Teeter v. Wallace.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Stenhouse v. Lynch, SEC. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Big Bear of North Carolina, Inc. v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API