Legal Opinion

Friedman's Express, Inc. v. Dial Corp. (In re Friedman's Express, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1995No. Bankruptcy No. 93-21066T; Adv. No. 95-2193Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Presently before the court are two motions filed by defendant, The Dial Corporation (“defendant”). In the first motion, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 defendant asserts that the complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In the second motion, defendant requests referral of plaintiffs interstate claims to the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”) for determination under the doctrine of “primary jurisdiction.”

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

The Court has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. F.P. Corp. v. Ken Way Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API