Legal Opinion
Standard Marine Ins. Co. v. Nome Beach Lighterage & Transportation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1904No. 979PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This writ of error brings up for review a judgment against the Standard Marine Insurance Company, Limited, based upon a policy covering certain articles laden on the barkentine Catherine Sudden for a voyage from the port of San Francisco to Nome, Alaska, whereby the insurance company insured certain merchandise of the defendant in error, laden below deck, in the sum of $5,250, and a lighterage plant, also belonging to the defendant in error, laden on deck, in the sum of $3,000, against —
“Perils of the seas, pirates, assailing thieves, jettisons, barratry of the master or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The " Potomac"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Orient Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- American Insurance v. Ogden & McCombNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Cleveland v. Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. FerrenbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Nuffer v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Sorenson v. Boston Ins. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.