Legal Opinion

Stamp-Ad, Inc. v. Barton Raben, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 29, 1996No. 01-95-00567-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from a contract dispute. It involves sufficiency of the evidence to support jury findings, and the trial court’s rulings on motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm in part and reverse and render in part.

This breach of contract action involves two “executive search” contracts between the executive search company, Barton Raben, Inc., and its client, Stamp-Ad, Inc. Barton Raben sued Stamp-Ad for failure to pay Barton Raben for executive searches performed. Stamp-Ad responded that Barton Raben failed to perform the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mancorp, Inc. v. CULPEPPEERTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Stewart v. BaseyTexas Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Abraxas Petroleum Corp. v. Hornburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  2. Cullins v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Pegasus Energy Group, Inc. v. Cheyenne Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  4. ExxonMobil Corp. v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. Taub v. Houston Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API