Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2004No. E2001-01734-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted permission to appeal in this case to determine whether the trial court erred in considering the results of the defendant sex offender’s polygraph examination when denying the defendant’s request for probation. The polygraph examination was administered as part of the risk assessment report that is mandated by statute for all sex offenders seeking probation. Because polygraph examinations are inherently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. AshbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Marable v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. PooleTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. IrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. HartmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DamronTennessee Supreme Court · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API