Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Parker

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1956No. 1066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, J.

The defendant Vermont Marble Company’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint raises the single question: can a plaintiff join the employer and the employee as parties-defendant in an action of tort where the employer’s liability for the alleged negligent act of the employee is based solely on the doctrine of respondeat superior?

The plaintiff declares that he was a pedestrian lawfully using the public highway and that while so doing he was injured in a motor vehicle accident involving two automobiles, one of which, he says, was being negligently operated by the defendant George N. Parker, who…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchwyhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Skala v. LehonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Kabatchnick v. Hanover-Elm Building Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. RaparotSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. Buxton v. Springfield Lodge No. 679, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc. and MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. English v. MyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Shahi v. DonnellyVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API