Legal Opinion

In re Rochlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee brings this proceeding to confirm a hearing panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Respondent Martin Rochlin was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the First Judicial Department on December 12, 1958. Thereafter, he maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Judicial Department. Prior to the present proceeding, respondent had an unblemished record.

The respondent does not oppose the hearing panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. In those findings of fact, the hearing panel…

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re VignolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re RochlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Matter of KoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Matter of KoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API