Legal Opinion

Mom N Pops, Inc. v. City of Charlotte

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided August 22, 1997No. 3:97CV308-McKPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McKNIGHT, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the undersigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) upon express consent of the parties, to consider Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction “preventing Defendants ... from enforcing any requirement of the City Code that Plaintiff obtain a city business license or zoning approval before opening at 5920 South Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina, and further from enforcing any of the provisions of § 12.522 of the City’s Code, until such time as the Court rules on the claim for a declaratory…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of RoyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of SpokaneDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2002
  4. Richmond Medical Center for Women v. GilmoreDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  5. State v. HannaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API