Legal Opinion

Burns v. Underwriters Adjusting Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1988No. 88-200PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

Appellant Burns appeals from the order of the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District granting summary judgment to respondents Underwriters Adjusting Company and Continental Insurance Company (Underwriters and Continental). We affirm.

The issue is whether Underwriters and Continental may be sued for counts based on their failure to defend their insured, Troy Zeiler. Burns sued Zeiler alleging that Zeiler negligently struck Burns. Underwriters and Continental refused to defend the suit because their investigation revealed that the policy excluded coverage for the injury inflicted on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. PhalenMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance v. McGeheeMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rae Volunteer Fire Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tidyman's Manangement Services Inc. v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Revelation Industries, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. New Hampshire Insurance Group v. StreckerMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Grimsrud v. HagelMontana Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API