Legal Opinion

Moorman Mfg. Co. v. Coan

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 24, 1983No. Civ. 3654PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sued the defendant on an open account. After anore tenus hearing the trial court entered a judgment for the defendant.

The plaintiff, through able counsel, appeals and we affirm.

The dispositive issue before us is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant the plaintiff's post-trial motion for a new trial under rule 59, A.R.Civ.P. That motion was bottomed on the premise that the "judgment is contrary to the great preponderance of the evidence." Additionally, the plaintiff contends the trial court erred in overruling its alternative post-trial motion which plaintiff asserts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pitts v. HenleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Holcombe v. BlackwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Hereford v. HerefordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. McGhee v. Conveyor Machinery Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gold Kist, Inc. v. TedderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Cook Transports, Inc. v. BeaversCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Cheek v. CheekCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Shires v. ShiresCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API