Legal Opinion

Holcombe v. Blackwell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1980No. Civ. 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendant, Douglas Cecil Holcombe, for malicious prosecution.

Charges of grand larceny were filed against the plaintiffs, Billy Blackwell and Roger Weafer, based on a sworn statement executed by the defendant. The grand larceny charges were later nol prossed on motion of the State.

The plaintiffs then filed the present action against the defendant for malicious prosecution. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $7,500. The defendant filed a motion for a new trial and the motion was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kansas City M. & B. R. R. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Sangster v. SangsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gold Kist, Inc. v. TedderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Moorman Mfg. Co. v. CoanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Arata v. GustinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Watts Homes, Inc. v. AlonzoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. K-Mart Corp. v. WestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API