McGhee v. Conveyor Machinery Corp.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal brought pro se from judgment denying an ARCP Rule 60(b) motion.

We affirm.

Plaintiff originally brought suit claiming workmen’s compensation. He was represented throughout that action by competent counsel. The court heard the evidence. It entered judgment finding plaintiff had suffered neither accident nor injury while engaged in the scope of his employment with defendant. No post-trial motion was filed. Nearly four months after judgment, plaintiff filed a Rule 60(b) motion alleging that there were witnesses and evidence which could have sustained his…