McLennan v. Wellington
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Ellsworth District Court. 4 CTION by Wellington and another against Allen, as principal, and McLennan and another, as sureties, on a certain bond. Judgment for plaintiffs, September 30, 1889. The defendant sureties allege error, and bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
This was an action brought by Wellington & Brundage against L. L. Allen as principal, and A. N. McLennan and G. H. Luedde as sureties, on a bond executed by the plaintiffs in error and conditioned that the principal would faithfully perform a contract which Allen had entered into with the defendants in error, for the construction of certain parts of a building. The bond was in the sum of $2,000. The condition reads as follows:
“ Whereas, L. L. Allen has contracted with Messrs. Wellington & Brundage to execute, construct and complete the work specified in contract for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dorsey v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Western Building & Loan Ass'n v. FitzmauriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
3Cited by12 opinions
- De Mattos v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Doyle v. FaustMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- School District No. 3 v. DeLanoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Risse v. Hopkins Planing Mill Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Coyle v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.