Legal Opinion

Goldman v. . Insurance Company of North America

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered December 3,1920, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff and directed a dismissal of the complaint.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered December 3,1920, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff and directed a dismissal of the complaint. The action was upon an insurance policy which, after including theft as one of the risks thereby covered, stated “ except as hereinafter specified,” and then provided: “ This policy covers theft of an entire shipping package but .all pilferage is…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moldovan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Breslerman v. Newark InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  3. New York Fire Insurance Co. v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API