Legal Opinion

Breslerman v. Newark Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 25, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph Heller,

Arbitrator. Defendant insured plaintiff under a Personal Effects Floater Policy against all risk of loss or damage to the insured property. The policy covers ‘1 personal effects such as' are usually carried by tourists and travellers, belonging to and used or worn by the insured and or his wife and their unmarried children permanently residing together.”

The policy excludes, “ automobiles, motors, motorcycles, bicycles, boats or other conveyances, or their appurtenances," accounts, bills, currency, deeds, evidences of debt, letters of credit, passports, documents, money, notes,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Matthews v. . American Central Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Birnbaum v. Jamestown Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Williams v. . Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Topeka Railway Equipment, Inc. v. Foremost InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API