Legal Opinion

Moldovan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Isidob Wassebvogel,

Spec. Ref. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment determining that defendant, pursuant to the terms of a personal liability policy issued by it, is under a legal duty to defend plaintiffs and save them harmless from any judgment which may be obtained against them in a pending negligence action, to the extent of the coverage set forth in said policy.

On or about October 12,1955, a young boy of 9 or 10 entered plaintiffs’ premises to retrieve a ball with which he had been playing. At this time, plaintiffs kept a boxer dog on a chain in their back yard. On the boy’s second…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. . American Central Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Goldman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Goldman v. . Insurance Company of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Moldovan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API