Legal Opinion

Howard v. . Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.

The appeal in this case is based on one exception only, and that to the continuance of the restraining order until the final hearing.

The defendants asked this Court to disregard the findings of fact by the trial court and to examine all the evidence appearing in the record, and to find therefrom that the plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief sought.

We recognize in such cases the jurisdiction of this Court to review the evidence and determine questions of fact as well as of law. Cameron v. Highway Commission, 188 N. C., 84; Mayo v. Comrs., 122 N. C., 5; Hooker v. Greenville, 130 N. C.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. Dehart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Mayo v. Commissioners of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Lee v. Town of WaynesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Perry v. Commissioners of BladenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bank of PinehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Causey v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Western Carolina Power Co. v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Paschal v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Perry v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API