Legal Opinion
Andrade v. Crawford & Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 10, 1992No. 1:91CV1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Ricardo Andrade brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act against Crawford & Company for race and sex discrimination in employment. Andrade alleges that he was effectively forced to leave his job as a casualty adjuster because he was subjected to harsher working conditions than similarly situated white and female employees. Relying on the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Andrade has moved to amend his complaint to assert a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. This motion was initially granted by this Court, and Crawford has moved for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marrero-Rivera v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- Graffam v. Scott Paper Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1994
- Jaekel v. Equifax Marketing Decision Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Andrade v. Crawford & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- Jaekel v. Equifax Marketing Decision Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.