Legal Opinion

Graffam v. Scott Paper Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 2, 1994No. Civ. 93-64-P-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

This consolidated case arose from a reduction in force effective on March 13, 1991, in which a number of employees, including Plaintiffs, were permanently discharged from Scott Paper Company’s S.D. Warren paper mill in Westbrook, Maine. Plaintiffs, eleven former salaried employees of the mill, allege age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1985 & Pamph.1994) 1 (Count VI), and the Maine Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 4551-4633 (1989 & Supp.1994) 2 (Count I). The two…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  2. Association of Mexican-American Educators v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
  3. Diehl v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  4. Bramble v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIODistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
  5. French v. Bath Iron Works Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API