Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1955No. 33171PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Is it error, under the circumstances of this case, to allow plaintiff wife alimony of one hundred fifty dollars per month, until the further order of court?

*498Plaintiff wife and defendant husband, both now fifty-three years of age, were married in 1921. Two sons, one adopted, are grown and self-supporting. At least as early as 1946, the parties separated as husband and wife, although they continued to live in the same house. When their younger son was graduated from high school, in 1952 (he is now in the armed forces), “the parties established new and separate domiciles and have lived entirely…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LockhartWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gordon v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Murray v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Herrett v. HerrettWashington Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Matter of Marriage of GlassCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Dakin v. DakinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Holloway v. HollowayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Husband B. v. Wife B.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API