Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bellino v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1998No. S-96-1121PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

The relator-appellee and cross-appellant, Richard T. Bellino, seeks a declaration that the requirements for signatures of registered voters on petitions to place a measure on a ballot through the initiative process, as contained in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-1409(1) (Cum. Supp. 1996), are unconstitutionally vague on their face and as applied by the respondent-appeñee and cross-appellant, Scott Moore, Secretary of State of Nebraska. The relator further prays that the secretary be compelled to place a gambling measure on the ballot. The appellants, John W. Blackhawk, Lance Gregory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brosnahan v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Betz v. BetzNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hall v. Progress Pig, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BeekenNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Zoucha Ex Rel. D.H. v. HennNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Interest of Lisa W.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dobrovolny v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2000
  5. Nebraskaland Leasing & Associates v. Borley Moving & Storage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API