Ventilated Cushion & Spring Co. v. D'Arcy
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge. On petition for rehearing.
1Per curiam
The grounds urged in support of the petition for rehearing, so far as it is necessary to notice them, are hereinafter mentioned.
1. Counsel say of our reference to Murray’s patent of 1885, No. 324,335, that we were mistaken in stating that Murray “employs, in-, verted conical springs with a short spring disposed within each of, the long springs.” The supposed mistake consists of an omission to call *469attention to the further fact that the short springs are there stretched and held, as counsel say, in an “extended position so as to be of thé same length as the other springs when the structure is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Vanmanen v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Meilink Steel Safe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
- Key Boiler Equipment Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.