Brunswick Corp. v. Outboard Marine Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
This action for infringement arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, et seq. Defendant denies infringement and alleges that the patent in question is invalid. Defendant has also filed a counterclaim for declaratory judgment on the issue of the patent’s validity. Plaintiff, in turn, has moved under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order of this court striking defendant’s declaratory judgment counterclaim on the grounds that it is redundant, sham, and frivolous. The parties have submitted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kalo Inoculant Co. v. Funk Bros. Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975