Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martinez

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY ALLEN, J.:

Alexis Martinez (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his convictions for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (“PWID”), possession of a controlled substance, possession of a small amount of marijuana, and resisting arrest.1 We affirm.

The trial court recited the underlying facts and procedural history of this case as follows:

The charges herein arise from incidents which occurred on December 8, 2009, when members of the Pennsylvania State Police conducted a search, including a strip search, of [Appellant].

It is undisputed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Int. of: N.R.M., a MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Wimms v. City of Philadelphia Civil Service Commission, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API