Legal Opinion

Carter v. Southern Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 31, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Union, September, 1905. Action by Mamie Isabel Carter against Southern Railway Go. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Ticket may or may not be contract between passenger and carrier: 6 Cyc., 570, 585; 4 Fllioitt on R. R., par. 1593; Hutch, an Car., pars. 580, 580g; Ray’s Neg. of Imposed Duties, par. 56; 1 Fetter on Car. of Pass., 766. Passenger on wrong train must change cars: 9 Mack., 63 ; 6 Duer„ 533; 3 Thomji. on Neg., pars. 3563-4; 34…

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Union, September, 1905. Action by Mamie Isabel Carter against Southern Railway Go. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Ticket may or may not be contract between passenger and carrier: 6 Cyc., 570, 585; 4 Fllioitt on R. R., par. 1593; Hutch, an Car., pars. 580, 580g; Ray’s Neg. of Imposed Duties, par. 56; 1 Fetter on Car. of Pass., 766. Passenger on wrong train must change cars: 9 Mack., 63 ; 6 Duer„ 533; 3 Thomji. on Neg., pars. 3563-4; 34 N. Y., 599. Conductor has no authority to disarrange sched%de: 65 Am. St. R., 35. Nor is he bound by special contract…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Carter, recovered a judgment of $800'against the defendant, Southern Railway Company, for injuries which she alleges resulted from defendant refusing to stop its train and put her off at Zirconia, N. C., to which point she held a ticket, purchased at Union, S. C., where she had taken the train. The defendant’s appeal raises interesting questions as to the rights of a passenger holding a ticket toi a station at which the train he is on does not sltop.

The defendant had two daily trains passing Union, S- C., and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pickens v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  2. Willis v. West. Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. Samuels v. Richmond &c. RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Campbell v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. LeBeau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Black v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Harper v. Weston Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API