Legal Opinion

Pickens v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 25, 1899PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Before Watts, J., Aiken, February, 1898. Action by Lucy H. Pickens against South Carolina and Georgia Railroad Company. From judgment and verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals. As to measure of damages: 51 S. C., 484; 50 Pac. R., 438; 70 Mo., 288; 116 Pa. St., 344; 139 Pa. St., 363; 54 Mich., 55; 19 N. W. R., 747; 25 S. C., 70: Dud., 180; 9 Exch., 341; 53 S. C., 412; 52 S. C., 323; t Strob., 525; 7 Wall., 52; 133 Mass., 15; 85 Pa. St, 293; 113 N. C., 49; 25 Am.

Read the full summary

Before Watts, J., Aiken, February, 1898. Action by Lucy H. Pickens against South Carolina and Georgia Railroad Company. From judgment and verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals. As to measure of damages: 51 S. C., 484; 50 Pac. R., 438; 70 Mo., 288; 116 Pa. St., 344; 139 Pa. St., 363; 54 Mich., 55; 19 N. W. R., 747; 25 S. C., 70: Dud., 180; 9 Exch., 341; 53 S. C., 412; 52 S. C., 323; t Strob., 525; 7 Wall., 52; 133 Mass., 15; 85 Pa. St, 293; 113 N. C., 49; 25 Am. St. R., 542^52 N. H., 552; 65 Me., 449; 95 U. S., 117; 33 Md., 542; 78 Cal., 517. Charge that certain facts constitute negligence…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action, the first of which is as follows: I. The first paragraph alleges the corporate existence of the defendant. “II. That at the said times, the defendant was operating in connection with its railroad, the Carolina, Cumberland Gap and Chicago Railroad, the same being a line of railway running from the city of Aiken, in this State, to the town of Edge-field, also in this State, and then owned by the Carolina, Cumberland Gap and Chicago Railway Company, tvhich was also a corporation created by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. Lockwood & CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Carson v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Bodie v. Char. & West. Car. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. Furman v. A. C. Tuxbury Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  4. MacHen v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Jenkins v. GilliganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API