Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Grismer v. Merger Mines Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1940No. 27681PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The Merger Mines Corporation is organized under the laws of Arizona. It is authorized to do business in this state and has a registered office in the city of Spokane. The respondents are shareholders. This action was instituted upon their relation for the purpose of obtaining an inspection of the books and records of the corporation, including the share register or list of shareholders. The complaint alleged that proper demand for such inspection had been made upon the officers of the corporation, and that such demand had been refused.
The appellants, in their answer, admitted that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cochran v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Boldt v. St. Cloud Milk Producers' Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of HussNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tucson Gas & Electric Company v. SchantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Estate v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Wicks v. Puget Sound Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- The Estate of Cory Bishop, Deceased, Ethel May Bishop, Administratrix C.T.A. v. Antilles Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Estate of KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.