Legal Opinion

Jankovics v. New York Automobile Insurance Plan

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter C. Patsalos, J.

Was petitioner insurance broker’s application to increase his allotment of temporary identification cards from 150 to 200 properly denied under the New York Automobile Insur*580anee Plan? This is the rather unusual issue raised by the CPLR article 78 proceeding now before the court.

The salient facts are not in dispute. The New York Automobile Insurance Plan is a quasi-State agency, having as its sole obligation the assignment of motor vehicle insurance coverage to applicants "who are in good faith entitled to but are unable to procure it through ordinary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Hamptons Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Furey v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Stutzman v. FaheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Providence Washington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API