Legal Opinion

Thomas A. Warmus v. Lewis Melahn James Oetting William Hobbs

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1995No. 93-4083PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Thomas A. Warmus appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 damages action against Lewis Melahn, the former director of the Missouri Department of Insurance (MDI), and two of his subordinates, James Oetting and William Hobbs. In dismissing the court acted under the Younger abstention doctrine, which is premised oh the “longstanding public policy against federal court interference with state court proceedings.” Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43, 91 S.Ct. 746, 750, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Warmus…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Robert Simpson v. Tim RowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Massachusetts Delivery Ass'n v. CoakleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2007
  4. Fuller v. UllandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Mary Amerson v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API