Legal Opinion

People v. Lasko

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2000No. S069354PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.—

Under California law, murder is the unlawful killing of a human being or a fetus, with malice aforethought. Malice is express when the killer harbors a deliberate intent to unlawfully take away a human life. Malice is implied when the killer lacks an intent to kill but acts with conscious disregard for life, knowing such conduct endangers the life of another.

When a killer intentionally but unlawfully kills in a sudden quarrel or heat of passion, the killer lacks malice and is guilty only of voluntary manslaughter. We hold here that this is also true of a killer who, acting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API