Legal Opinion

Shepard v. LA GRANGE OIL & FUEL COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1955No. 176PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal for the reason that in the copy of appellant’s brief mailed or delivered to appellee’s counsel within the time prescribed by Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, 562, the several grounds of exception and assignment of error had no reference to the pages of the transcript is allowed. This rule of court is mandatory, and will be enforced. Bradshaw v. Stansberry, 164 N.C. 356, 79 S.E. 302; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126; S. v. Evans, 237 N.C. 761, 75 S.E. 2d 919.

In the instant case there are twenty-two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Johnson v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Bradshaw v. . StansberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Cudworth v. Reserve Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Lee v. Capitol Tire Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Horton v. Redevelopment Commission of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API