Bradshaw v. . Stansberry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiffs from Lane, J., at January Term, 1913, of Halifax.
1Per curiam
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal for failure to print the record and briefs in accordance with the rules of this Court is allowed.
The number of appeals has been increasing year by year under conditions heretofore existing, and with the additional facilities for trials in the Superior Courts, brought about by four new judicial districts, we may reasonably expect a further increase of from 15 to 20 per cent.
It is, therefore, necessary to have rules of procedure and to adhere to them, and if we relax them in favor of one, we might as well abolish them.
We have, however, examined…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lee v. Baird.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
3Cited by28 opinions
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Steingress v. SteingressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Dogwood Development and Management Co. v. White Oak Transport Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Holland v. HeavnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.