Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1913No. 2208PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and given eighteen months in the State penitentiary.

The alleged purchaser and main witness for the prosecution was named Koethe. After giving an account of himself in his various preambulations in different locations he finally located himself in Amarillo, in Potter County. He says about the 17tli or 18th of March, 1912, he had a business transaction with appellant in reference to intoxicating liquor; and bought liquor from him under the following circumstances: “I gave him two dollars and asked him if he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dever v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Key v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Bauer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. Laughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. State v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API