Legal Opinion

Richard J. Dillane v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 17, 1965No. 19023_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

Although the procedural situation is somewhat confused because of the multiple and alternative nature of appellant’s motions in the District Court, what we consider to be before us is essentially an appeal from that court’s action in denying leave to appeal in forma pauperis because the petition was filed after the time had expired in which a notice of appeal from a criminal conviction may be filed. Rule 37(a) (2), Fed. R.Crim.P. There being no issue of fact as to the failure to file an appeal within the prescribed time, the District Court’s action was correct under United States v. Robinson,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. W. C. Dodd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Henry Franklin Boruff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. George C. Desmond v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Arthur Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. García Troncoso v. Administración del Derecho al TrabajoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
  5. Horace Edward Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API