Legal Opinion

State v. Muhannad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2013No. S-13-042PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. MUHANNAD 567 Cite as

286 Neb. 567

not evidence of anything. We conclude that Morgan has not established prejudice by counsel’s failure to object or to other- wise keep the evidence envelopes from being published to the jury with the word “murder” on them. VI. CONCLUSION We conclude that there was no prejudicial error in the dis- trict court’s giving of the step jury instruction or in its refusal to give Morgan’s proposed instruction. We further conclude that two of Morgan’s claims of ineffective assistance of coun- sel are without merit, but that the record is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MuhannadNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BixbyNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. People v. AugustColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. BixbyNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. RamosNebraska Court of Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API