State v. Muhannad
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. MUHANNAD 59 Cite as
290 Neb. 59
fall. Here, the District, the movant, did not produce evidence of an alternative cause. It is always possible, of course, that Hughes’ feet simply became tangled, even if there is direct evidence to the contrary. But a plaintiff is not bound to exclude the possibility that the event might have happened in some other way.36 Contrary to the District’s argument, Hughes’ case is not doomed because there is more than one possible cause. It is enough for summary judgment purposes that the evidence permits a reasonable inference that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DillardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HoerleNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Hughes v. School Dist. of AuroraNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LavalleurNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ToddNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BedollaNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.