Legal Opinion

Hocking Conservancy District v. Dodson-Lindblom Associates, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1980No. 79-1472PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The sole issue in the instant cause is whether the one-year statute of limitations, under the purview of R. C. 2305.11(A), applies to negligence actions brought against a professional engineer. More precisely, the issue is whether negligence by a professional engineer constitutes “malpractice” within the meaning of R. C. 2305.11(A).

R. C. 2305.11(A) reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

“An action for libel, slander, assault, battery, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, or malpractice, including an action for malpractice against a physician, podiatrist, or a hospital, or upon a statute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matthews v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  4. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Holman v. Grandview Hospital & Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API