Hocking Conservancy District v. Dodson-Lindblom Associates, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
The sole issue in the instant cause is whether the one-year statute of limitations, under the purview of R. C. 2305.11(A), applies to negligence actions brought against a professional engineer. More precisely, the issue is whether negligence by a professional engineer constitutes “malpractice” within the meaning of R. C. 2305.11(A).
R. C. 2305.11(A) reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
“An action for libel, slander, assault, battery, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, or malpractice, including an action for malpractice against a physician, podiatrist, or a hospital, or upon a statute…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matthews v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by30 opinions
- Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Holman v. Grandview Hospital & Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.