Legal Opinion

Indian Creek Drainage District No. 2 v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. 13294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the County Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Paul Samuell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:: This is an appeal by the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company from a judgment of confirmation entered by-the county court of Morgan county upon the verdict of a jury called to assess benefits and damages”to said railroad in a proceeding to improve the drainage in Indian Creek Drainage District No. 2. Said district was organized under the Levee act by an order of the county court of said county, and thereafter an assessment roll was filed, as provided in said act, on September 20, 1919, and an order entered for a venire for a jury to assess benefits and damages. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Claussen Park Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wabash Railroad Co. v. Coon Run Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chicago & State Line Railway Co. v. MinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Commissioners of Sny Island Levee Drainage District v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. East Side Levee & Sanitary District v. East St. Louis & Carondelet RailwayIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Click v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API