Richardson v. . Cheek
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe guiding star in the interpretation of wills, to which all rules must bend unless contrary to some rule of law or public policy, is tbe intent of tbe testator, and this is to be ascertained from tbe four corners of tbe will, considering for tbe purpose tbe will and any codicil or codicils as constituting but one instrument. Ellington v. Trust Co., 196 N. C., 755, 147 S. E., 286; 28 R. C. L., 211 et seq.
Our first concern, tben, is with tbe intention of tbe testator. What did be intend by bis will? To find this is to solve tbe problem. Heyer v. Bulluck, 210 N. C., 321, 186 S. E., 356.
A will…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Herring v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Goode v. . HearneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Hubbard v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.