Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1954No. 458PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The one question to be determined on this ’ appeal is whether the testatrix intended to • give J. Samuel Hubbard the three $100.00 U. S. Bonds, Series D, which were payable to her or J. Sam Hubbard, and $100.00; or did she intend to give him the six:$1,000.00 U.'S. Bonds, Series D, payable to herself, Mrs. Christian Gay Pate, and $100.0.0? '

*206We are not inadvertent to tbe fact that if tbe testatrix in tbe instant case bad died intestate, J. Samuel Hubbard would bave been entitled to tbe three $100.00 U. S. Bonds, Series D, as a matter of law. Ervin v. Conn, 225 N.C. 267, 34 S.E. 2d 402; Watkins…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Blake v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Tanner v. ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API