Hubbard v. Wiggins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The one question to be determined on this ’ appeal is whether the testatrix intended to • give J. Samuel Hubbard the three $100.00 U. S. Bonds, Series D, which were payable to her or J. Sam Hubbard, and $100.00; or did she intend to give him the six:$1,000.00 U.'S. Bonds, Series D, payable to herself, Mrs. Christian Gay Pate, and $100.0.0? '
*206We are not inadvertent to tbe fact that if tbe testatrix in tbe instant case bad died intestate, J. Samuel Hubbard would bave been entitled to tbe three $100.00 U. S. Bonds, Series D, as a matter of law. Ervin v. Conn, 225 N.C. 267, 34 S.E. 2d 402; Watkins…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Carroll v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Blake v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Tanner v. ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.