Legal Opinion

Kinsella v. Kern

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The reclassification of the positions by the civil service commission could not validly effect the removal of the then incumbents, and the latter could retain their positions without the necessity of taking any examination, competitive or qualifying. In Matter of Sandford v. Finegan (276 N. Y. 70) the Court of Appeals, in discussing the rights of a person occupying a position with no definite tenure, said (p. 73): “ He would be continued in the position without taking an examination after the position had been placed in the competitive class (Matter of Fornara v. Schroeder, 261 N. Y. 363).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Fornara v. SchroederNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Matter of Sugden v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Matter of Sandford v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amico v. Erie County LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Fink v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Beggs v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bell v. County of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Pavone v. BarclayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API