Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Illinois Farmers Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 8, 2009No. 1-08-0458, 1-08-0583 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gallagher

This consolidated appeal involves the definition of an “insured” for purposes of both uninsured (UM) and underinsured (UIM) motorist coverage in automobile insurance policies issued by Illinois Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers). Kenneth W. Schultz, executor of the estate of Patricia Smetana, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Farmers, upholding Farmers’ use of different definitions of an insured under the UM and UIM sections of its policy. In an unrelated case, Farmers appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Barbara Weglarz, finding an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sulser v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. VillicanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cummins v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. DeSaga v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Pajic v. Old Republic InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Direct Auto Insurance Co. v. MerxAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. Bartlow v. CostiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API