Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2016No. 09-99017Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomas, Chief Judge

I agree with the majority that Mann is not entitled to relief on his claims of guilt-phase ineffective assistance of counsel. I respectfully disagree that he is not entitled to relief on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.

I

Before venturing into the dense thicket of AEDPA nuances, we must recognize at the onset that, although the law may not provide a remedy, Mann was sentenced to death under an unconstitutional sentencing scheme.

First, his death sentence was imposed by a judge, not a jury, under a system that the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API