Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomas, Chief Judge
I agree with the majority that Mann is not entitled to relief on his claims of guilt-phase ineffective assistance of counsel. I respectfully disagree that he is not entitled to relief on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part.
I
Before venturing into the dense thicket of AEDPA nuances, we must recognize at the onset that, although the law may not provide a remedy, Mann was sentenced to death under an unconstitutional sentencing scheme.
First, his death sentence was imposed by a judge, not a jury, under a system that the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.