Legal Opinion · Dissent

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 2015No. 09-99018Published

1Dissent

BEA, Circuit Judge,

dissenting, with whom KOZINSKI, GOULD, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, join:

A state cannot impose the death penalty unless the sentencer has considered all evidence submitted as to the defendant’s condition, character, and background. Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 113-15, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982) (explaining that a sentencer may not “refuse to consider, as a matter of law, any relevant mitigating evidence”). As a result, defendants so sentenced usually and legitimately proffer mitigation evidence provoking sympathy in the hope it will persuade the…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API