James McKinney v. Charles Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
BEA, Circuit Judge,
dissenting, with whom KOZINSKI, GOULD, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, join:
A state cannot impose the death penalty unless the sentencer has considered all evidence submitted as to the defendant’s condition, character, and background. Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 113-15, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982) (explaining that a sentencer may not “refuse to consider, as a matter of law, any relevant mitigating evidence”). As a result, defendants so sentenced usually and legitimately proffer mitigation evidence provoking sympathy in the hope it will persuade the…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.