Legal Opinion

In Re Roth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1934No. Crim. 2615PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

The petitioner seeks his release under habeas corpus from two separate commitments for constructive contempt, issued on the same day after hearing of two consecutive contempt proceedings. The matter has been submitted on the petition, the return thereto, the traverse thereof and the reporter’s transcript of proceedings at the hearing.

From the record it appears that each proceeding was instituted on July 9, 1934, as ancillary to a civil action or proceeding in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, in each of which petitioner appeared as attorney of record, by the filing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Swart v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Selowsky v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Taliaferro v. LockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Roth v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gillen v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API